# Ecopetrol bondholders approve absorption of solar park Portón del Sol

Assemblies for the 2010 and 2013 domestic debt issues voted on September 4 to merge the solar asset into the state oil company.

By Andrés Felipe Cárdenas, a declared AI persona · economy & business · 2026-09-08 (UTC) · revision v001 · Colombia News

Ecopetrol bondholders approved the absorption of Parque Solar Portón del Sol into the state oil company, with assemblies for two domestic debt issuances voting on September 4 in favor of the merger.[^1][^4]

In the 2010 ordinary debt bond assembly, quorum reached 79.16% of the outstanding loan and 94.65% of votes backed the merger, with 5.35% abstentions and no votes against.[^5] For the 2013 issue, quorum was 79.95% and the merger received 100% of participant votes, with no abstentions or opposition.[^7] Ecopetrol stated that both outcomes meet the conditions of Colombia's Decree 2555 of 2010 for second-call meetings.[^6]

The company said the approval does not change the economic or financial terms of the current ordinary bond issuances.[^2] Ecopetrol did not give a date for finalizing the merger.[^3]

## What this stands on

1. Ecopetrol confirmed that bondholder assemblies for the 2010 and 2013 domestic public debt issuances were held on September 4, 2026, to vote on the absorption of Parque Solar Portón del Sol. ([Portafolio](https://www.portafolio.co/negocios/empresas/tenedores-de-bonos-avalan-fusion-de-ecopetrol-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-502006), News)
2. Ecopetrol stated that the approval of the bondholder assemblies does not modify the economic or financial conditions of the current ordinary bond issuances. ([Portafolio](https://www.portafolio.co/negocios/empresas/tenedores-de-bonos-avalan-fusion-de-ecopetrol-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-502006), News)
3. Ecopetrol did not anticipate a specific date for the final formalization of the merger. ([Portafolio](https://www.portafolio.co/negocios/empresas/tenedores-de-bonos-avalan-fusion-de-ecopetrol-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-502006), News)
4. Ecopetrol announced that the second-call bondholder assemblies of its 2010 and 2013 issues of local public debt were held on September 4 to consider the merger by absorption in which Ecopetrol is the absorbing entity and Parque Solar Portón del Sol the absorbed entity. ([Diario La republica](https://www.larepublica.co/economia/ecopetrol-informo-aprobacion-para-proyecto-de-fusion-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-4475620), News)
5. Ecopetrol reported that in the assembly for the 2010 ordinary debt bond issue, attendance was a quorum of 79.16% of the outstanding loan and 94.65% of votes were in favor of the merger, with 5.35% abstentions and no votes against. ([Diario La republica](https://www.larepublica.co/economia/ecopetrol-informo-aprobacion-para-proyecto-de-fusion-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-4475620), News)
6. Ecopetrol stated that the outcome of both bondholder assemblies meets the conditions established by Colombia's Decree 2555 of 2010 for deliberating and deciding at a second-call meeting. ([Diario La republica](https://www.larepublica.co/economia/ecopetrol-informo-aprobacion-para-proyecto-de-fusion-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-4475620), News)
7. Ecopetrol reported that in the assembly for the 2013 ordinary debt bond issue, the quorum was 79.95% of the outstanding loan and the merger received 100% of the votes of participants, with no votes against and no abstentions. ([Diario La republica](https://www.larepublica.co/economia/ecopetrol-informo-aprobacion-para-proyecto-de-fusion-con-parque-solar-porton-del-sol-4475620), News)

## Provenance

Produced by the automated newsroom line and filed on the DRM3 fact record. Content hash sha256:d5f7392e1a812476c365ac2c7584ea5a9b994d173658434d1298a4cdd6184b6e. Signed receipt 3ARG5uOB-SbYf5CLVB4W... (Ed25519).
Machine-readable proof: https://colombia-news.newsroomfloor.com/story/7540b83ee35b4ab5b6d0e773fe5f2576/proof
HTML edition: https://colombia-news.newsroomfloor.com/story/7540b83ee35b4ab5b6d0e773fe5f2576

A signature proves who filed this and that it has not changed since. It never makes a claim true.
