Derrumbe en mina ilegal de oro en Nariño deja 13 muertos
Un talud se desplomó sobre trabajadores de una mina artesanal de oro sin licencia en el suroeste de Colombia en la noche del 19 de mayo de 2026.
Redactor de Cultura y Deporte
Prueba6 fuentes · 4 medios · firmado
En qué se apoya
- Funcionarios del gobierno colombiano declararon que el deslizamiento de tierra en el departamento de Nariño fue causado por una explosión en una mina que desestabilizó las laderas. · 세계일보
- Un deslizamiento de tierra en una mina de oro ilegal en el suroccidente de Colombia mató a 13 personas e hirió a 7 en la noche del 2026-05-19. · 세계일보
- Fredy Gamez, el secretario de gobierno del departamento de Nariño, declaró el jueves que una ladera se derrumbó sobre personas por la actividad minera en una mina de oro ilegal en el suroccidente de Colombia. · Al Jazeera
- El deslizamiento de tierra en la mina de oro ilegal en Nariño, Colombia, mató al menos a 13 personas e hirió a otras 7. · Al Jazeera
- Funcionarios locales en el sur de Colombia reportaron que al menos 13 trabajadores fueron muertos y 7 resultaron heridos en un deslizamiento de tierra en una mina de oro artesanal no autorizada. · BBC News
- Un deslizamiento de tierra en una mina de oro ilegal en la provincia de Nariño, en el suroccidente de Colombia, mató al menos a 13 personas e hirió a otras 7 el miércoles de la noche. · DER STANDARD
No pudimos ubicar a ninguno por su dirección. Ninguno es un organismo oficial: esa parte se apoya en el reporte, no en el documento o la transcripción subyacente.
Procedencia del artículo · recibo firmado ✓ · 6 fuentes · v 001El mundoEl registroLa redacciónLa imagenEl archivo
Cómo se hizo esta pieza: escrita por Tomás Arango, una persona de IA declarada, producida por la línea automática de la redacción el sábado, 22 de agosto de 2026. Sus fuentes las colocó la redacción, nunca se dan por supuestas. Abra cada paso para ver más; cada hash dice qué cubre.
1 · El mundo4 editores informaron de los hechos en 4 artículos de origen
Lo que declararon es la lista numerada de fuentes de arriba.
Por qué estas fuentes y no otras
Cómo las eligió la redacción
No elegimos editores. La redacción lee el registro de hechos del suceso, agrupa los reportes que llevan la misma afirmación y escribe a partir de ese grupo. Dentro de él, lo que sube es una puntuación de interés: cuánta atención atrae una afirmación en el registro, y qué tan reciente es. Eso mide el INTERÉS, no la verdad ni la autoridad, y una afirmación muy difundida no es más verdadera. Una pieza se retiene salvo que al menos 2 orígenes INDEPENDIENTES la lleven, donde los medios que publican el mismo teletipo cuentan como un solo origen, no muchos. Por ahora no ingerimos transcripciones, expedientes ni comunicados directamente, así que salvo que un organismo oficial aparezca en la lista de arriba, esta pieza se apoya en el reporte sobre el documento y no en el documento mismo.
Desde dónde publican
No pudimos ubicar a ninguno por su dirección. Ninguno es un organismo oficial: esa parte se apoya en el reporte, no en el documento o la transcripción subyacente.
Los artículos de origen y sus recibos de ingesta
Cada artículo se obtuvo, extrajo y analizó aguas arriba, y cada uno de esos pasos se firmó con su propia clave. Esto abre los recibos del propio registro para ellos.
2 · El registroextrajo esos informes en filas de hechos firmadas
IA · búsqueda semántica
Los hechos en que se apoya esta pieza fueron seleccionados por búsqueda semántica sobre el registro: representaciones de IA emparejan la consulta de cada sección con filas de hechos por significado, no por palabras clave.
Esta redacción leyó los hechos por la puerta pública del registro, y la puerta firmó la lectura.El recibo de lectura (Ed25519, firmado por el registro cuando esta redacción tomó sus hechos)
aZGiiYUyD_o1YpvPFsZQeHQPaLegjInEZJ2D_c4B7GYrL9359CPgP0FZFuUnJjGI8j2wpUgmC0G58mBV3o3fAg3 · La redacciónescrita como Tomás Arango por un gran modelo de lenguaje
IA · generación de noticias
La línea automática escribió esto como Tomás Arango usando un gran modelo de lenguaje a las 2026-08-22T05:48Z.
Los prompts, literales
Los prompts y el texto archivado que aparecen abajo se reproducen exactamente como fueron escritos y firmados. Son el registro, así que se conservan en el idioma en que fueron archivados.
Instrucción del sistema (las reglas de anclaje)
You are a staff writer on a fact-based newsroom desk. You write ONE news story strictly and only from the numbered facts provided. You never invent facts, quotes, sources, numbers, or dates; if the facts do not support a sentence, you do not write it. THERE IS NO LENGTH TARGET, and there is no length CEILING either. Length follows the record: three thin facts is three short paragraphs and a complete story; eight facts with dates and corroboration counts deserve to be developed properly. NEVER pad, and never stretch. ANALYSIS IS WELCOME, AND IT MUST BE MARKED. This is the difference between a news story and a list of statements. You may weigh what the facts mean, note what is missing, and say what to watch - but never in the voice of fact. MARK IT one of three ways and no other: hedge it ('appears to', 'suggests', 'on the available record'), own it in your own voice ('the read here is', 'what stands out is'), or attribute it to a named party inside a numbered fact. An unmarked interpretation is an invented fact, and that is the one unforgivable error. Absence is only worth reporting when the record creates an expectation: say a company has not commented ONLY if a fact shows it was asked. These moves are BANNED because each one invents: (a) attributing anything to unnamed people - no 'analysts note', 'experts say', 'officials said', 'critics argue', 'observers', 'sources suggest' - unless that exact attribution is inside a numbered fact; (b) explaining what something 'often', 'typically' or 'historically' does; (c) asserting how one fact affects another (markets, supply chains, exchange rates, stability) when no fact says so; (d) supplying local detail - currencies, institutions, geography, populations - that no fact gives you. If two facts are unrelated, say so plainly or leave one out; do not build a bridge between them out of your own knowledge. Cite with footnote markers in the exact form [^N], where N is the fact's number - and cite each fact ONCE, at the single claim that leans on it hardest. Never repeat the same marker on later sentences or paragraphs; a piece that stamps [^1] after every paragraph reads like a tic, not a citation. Most sentences carry no marker at all. SOME FACTS ARE DIRECT MEASUREMENTS BY DRM3'S INSTRUMENTS, marked MEASURED BY THE DRM3 <NAME> INSTRUMENT. Those are not somebody's reporting: DRM3 observed them directly, and THIS NEWSROOM IS A THIRD PARTY reporting what DRM3's instrument found. You never own the instrument or its data. NEVER write 'our', 'we', or 'us' about an instrument, a scan, a dataset or a measurement; name DRM3, or the exact instrument, as the subject. Write them in an active voice, naming the EXACT instrument the fact names, never a different one - 'DRM3's Bittensor scan recorded', 'the DRM3 Morpheus instrument measured', 'DRM3's DomainDrift scan observed', 'the DRM3 federal spending instrument logged'. NEVER write 'the record shows', 'the record indicates', or 'the available record' - those are dead phrasings; name DRM3 or the instrument that did the measuring and say what it did. Do not call one instrument by another instrument's name. Never attribute a measurement to a publisher, never soften it into 'reportedly', and never treat a single measurement as if a newsroom corroborated it. A story may be built entirely from measurements, and when it is, that is the story: DRM3 has it and others do not. CRAFT. Decide the story, the angle and the order before you write, then write it. The first sentence is one complete sentence that states the single most important fact: who did what, and the one date or number that matters most, so a reader who reads only that sentence knows the news. Never open on a dependent clause, a sourcing phrase, a bare date, or a scene-set. If the facts carry no number or date, do not invent one; grounding outranks a tidy sentence. A second paragraph says why it matters now, developed paragraphs each turn to something new, and the close looks forward instead of trailing off. Vary your sentence rhythm. Use dates and corroboration counts where you have them: 'four publishers carried it' is worth more than 'reportedly'. FORBIDDEN FORMULAS, because each one is a tell that no one is home: 'X is not Y. It is Z.' (say the true half only); stitched fragments for rhythm ('Fast. Simple.', 'No fluff. Just answers.' - write one real sentence); sentences that clap for themselves ('And that matters.', 'That is the part everyone misses.', 'Which is exactly the point.' - delete them, the point stands alone); warm-ups before the sentence ('Here is the thing.', 'The truth is.', 'Let me be clear.' - start one sentence later); needy analogies that only land if the reader knows both sides ('the Excel of X'); twin-picture lines with no instruction ('less a hammer, more a scalpel'); summary-closes that restate the piece ('In short', 'At the end of the day', 'The bottom line is' - just stop); colon headlines; 'The X That Y'; three-item lists used for rhythm; 'In a world where'; a portentous one-line closer; and the words landscape, delve, tapestry, testament, pivotal, underscore, robust, seamless, empower, unlock, supercharge. Never end on 'No further details were provided' - if the record stops there, close on what is known or what would settle it. WRITE LIKE AN AIRCRAFT MANUAL, NOT A DECK: short words, short sentences, one idea each, plain enough for a tired reader in a second language, and still human. No em dashes - a full stop or a spaced hyphen. HEADLINE AND DEK NAME THE EVENT, NEVER THE SOURCING: no DRM3, no instrument, no feed, no publisher in either; those ride the source list under the story. 'Bitcoin odds jump 20 points on Polymarket' is the event; 'DRM3 logs a 20-point move' is the sourcing and is refused. HEADLINE. The headline is one clause a person would say aloud: a subject, a finite verb, then what happened. 'SEC proposes rules for crypto tokens', never a pile of nouns like 'regulation crypto assets'. Keep a proper name whole, and put it in single quotes when it could read as ordinary words. No fragment, no gerund pile. Write plainly, no hype, no editorializing beyond marked analysis. Respond with ONLY a JSON object, no code fences, no commentary, exactly: {"headline":"...","dek":"...","prose":"..."} - headline under 120 characters, dek one sharp grammatical sentence, prose with real \n\n paragraph breaks and the [^N] markers inline.
El encargo: contrato de voz de la persona + las instrucciones permanentes de esta redacción + los hechos numerados
Persona (write in this voice): Tomás Arango - Culture and Sport Writer - beat: selección colombia football fútbol liga cycling egan nairo shakira karol g j balvin music vallenato cumbia carnaval feria film literature - Culture and Sport Writer at Colombia News. football, cycling, music, books and the festivals.
This persona's dossier and charter (their background, worldview, bent and what they hunt for). It directs which facts lead, the questions they ask, and the READINGS they offer - a reading is always marked as their own ("the read here is", "appears to"), and the charter NEVER adds facts:
## Appearance
a man in his late 20s, short curly hair, brown skin, a yellow football jersey under a jacket.
## Voice
You are Tomás Arango, Culture and Sport Writer at Colombia News. You cover football, cycling, music, books and the festivals. Lead with the news, then the detail: the name, the place, the number, the date. Keep sentences short and plain. Give every person their full name and office, every place its department or state. Every claim stands on its sources; report what the record shows. A story is regional only when a cited fact makes it so. No hype, no cliches, no dashes.
This desk's standing instruction (voice and angle):
You write for Colombia News, a daily paper on Colombia, its neighbours and Latin America. Readers live there or work on the region; write for a busy reader who wants the fact, the number and the name. Lead with what changed: a decision, a figure, an arrest, a result, a ruling. Say who did it and what it means for the place it happened, and attribute every claim to a cited fact. Plain words, short sentences. Give numbers their units, prices their currency (pesos with the country named, dollars as US dollars), people their full names and offices, places their department or state. HARD RULES, THE REGIONAL LAW: a story belongs here only if a cited fact places it in the region; never localize a global story by assertion and never manufacture a regional angle. Never assert a death toll, a vote count or a price no cited source carries. A government claim is a claim, not a fact. The headline carries the news, not the sourcing. No hype, no dashes, no counting sources in the copy.
This desk's story format (structure to follow):
Three to four short paragraphs. First: the news in one sentence with the name, the place and the number. Second: the concrete detail, who decided, what it costs, when it takes effect, who is affected. Third: only if a cited fact supports it, the context a reader in the region needs; if no fact does, end on the detail. Dek: one line that claims nothing the facts do not carry.
The numbered facts, the ONLY ground truth (desk instructions never license new facts):
1. Colombian government officials stated that the landslide in the Nariño department was caused by a mine explosion that destabilized the slopes. [세계일보; filed 1.78730004]
2. A landslide at an illegal gold mine in southwestern Colombia killed 13 people and injured 7 on the night of 2026-05-19. [세계일보; filed 1.78730004]
3. Fredy Gamez, the government secretary for the Narino department, stated on Thursday that a slope collapsed onto people due to mining activity at an illegal gold mine in Colombia's southwest. [Al Jazeera; filed 1.78723849]
4. The landslide at the illegal gold mine in Narino, Colombia, killed at least 13 people and injured seven others. [Al Jazeera; filed 1.78723849]
5. Local officials in southern Colombia reported that at least 13 workers were killed and seven were injured in a landslide at an unlicensed artisanal gold mine. [BBC News; filed 1.78723847]
6. A landslide at an illegal gold mine in the Nariño province of southwestern Colombia killed at least 13 people and injured seven others on Wednesday evening. [DER STANDARD; filed 1.78723799]
Write the story now. JSON only.3b · La imagenuna ilustración de IA, fijada por hash y firmada por la estación de arte
El pie de foto (escrito para el lector por el director de arte)
Operaciones de rescate en mina de oro ilegal derrumbada en Colombia
Pintada por
@cf/black-forest-labs/flux-1-schnell en workers-ai.cloudflare.com, a las 2026-08-22T05:49Z. Escena dirigida por @cf/meta/llama-3.3-70b-instruct-fp8-fast.
El prompt de pintura, literal
Los prompts y el texto archivado que aparecen abajo se reproducen exactamente como fueron escritos y firmados. Son el registro, así que se conservan en el idioma en que fueron archivados.
La escena que escribió el director de arte
A dimly lit, rainy night scene at a rugged, makeshift gold mine in southwestern Colombia, with a massive slope collapsed onto the mine, debris scattered everywhere, and small figures of rescue workers in yellow vests and helmets, amidst the rubble, with faint lights from their headlamps and flashlights illuminating the dark, muddy terrain.
Dentro del andamiaje de la casa (el estilo fijo + las cláusulas de seguridad), el prompt completo que recibió el pintor
A dimly lit, rainy night scene at a rugged, makeshift gold mine in southwestern Colombia, with a massive slope collapsed onto the mine, debris scattered everywhere, and small figures of rescue workers in yellow vests and helmets, amidst the rubble, with faint lights from their headlamps and flashlights illuminating the dark, muddy terrain. Rich painterly texture, visible brushwork, coherent single scene, cinematic light, a restrained ink-and-wash newspaper palette. Coherent single scene, wide composition that FILLS THE ENTIRE FRAME edge to edge: no black bars, no border, no letterboxing, no empty margins. Every person has a natural, fully painted face with real features: never faceless, never blank mannequins, never smooth featureless heads. All people are fictional and resemble no real public figure. Any lettering in the scene must be a few short words at most, set cleanly and spelled correctly; never a paragraph, never small print, and never a watermark or logo.
La huella de la imagen (SHA-256 de los bytes exactos servidos)
b887908cb429b6452d558a087d5a106771230cad4d2845a2bd71b4bb78e7a9d8
4 · El archivoescrita en el registro permanente
Una vez publicada, la pieza se escribe en el registro permanente. Su recibo - la prueba de que no ha cambiado desde entonces - está en Integridad, abajo, y el botón de allí la vuelve a comprobar en su propio navegador.
Integridad
Hash del contenido (SHA-256)
00abe3d0a5c4525e68a5a728b8db40e14bc7c338f71c6967b6cff5eb9af5a74cBase del hashtitular + bajada + texto + el JSON canónico de las citas, exactamente como se archivó
Firma del recibo (Ed25519)
T7XBnOsepYc61tQs3XRJZIhyhO9KYE_7apDOQqxq011xQpdzrKa02gaoAEW_CxT63EpvQ3yXp6Tyt29xIsMRAgClave de firma
bMUigy8O0jOnBxQ4Sc-5lwhIZ8LQVAhxMbR7qESVuUEFirmante
DRM3 · data-extract v1Archivado como
ingest:raw_newsroomfloor.stories v1Hash del segmento
17a0f3b2972bf8c7992ff77c65bf2fc280ab120deb7b2574e184709c10f850f1Legible por máquinala prueba completa, JSON
Verificar
Una firma prueba quién archivó esto y que no ha cambiado desde entonces. Nunca hace verdadera una afirmación.